Looking back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to the full product?
Technically, since our preliminary task, we have improved significantly. When we filmed our preliminary task there was little to no thought put into lighting prior to our shoot, which I now blame on lack of experience in understanding the amount of thought and preparation that goes into making a scene come to life. Because of this, when we came to film, everything was very, very dark as we had no fill lights to brighten the scene. The shadows we created were not meaningful in anyway and no specific lighting techniques were achieved.
![]() |
Contrast in lighting between two shots merely seconds apart, creating a lack of continuity.
One of my favourite shots from the preliminary task is the close up of the door handle. I just think it really sets the scene for what it is to come, establishing the characters as extraordinary. However, because of bad lighting, this shot is ruined. It's a shame, but it appears as though it has a grainy, sepia filter because of the lack of light. If we had known how to alter the contrast and brightness of shots on premier pro like we do now, we could have made several of the shots brighter and alter their colouration so they all were similarly lit as opposed to completely random, therefore create a lack of continuity.
In our Thriller opening, lighting was taken very seriously because of our failure on the preliminary task. We learnt from our mistakes and instead filmed in broad daylight. This was because of numerous reasons, one being we were afraid that we didn't have the set up to create a decently lit opening, and two because of our intertextual references to both The Hunger Games and Inception, their openings, (which we took inspiration from), both filmed in broad daylight also. I was happy with what we achieved within our lighting though, personally being able to create a lens flare, the contrast in lighter and darker regions of this shot invoking drama.
Camerawork in our preliminary task was also abysmal. The use of shot reverse shot, due to lack of footage, was far too fast and jumpy, not really aiding to support our already weak narrative. This particular scenario taught me that you can never have too much footage, and although we had to go out and reshoot the ending of our Thriller opening, this was due to camera reasons, we still managed to capture a considerable amount more shots than we actually needed. In our Thriller opening, the camerawork creates a linear narrative in terms of camerawork and editing. The jump cuts we use are intentional, and not because we have a lack of footage. Also, the only use of shot reverse shot we applied to our Thriller held significance, a steadicam close up of our character George, showing his fear to the audience, switching to a handheld zoom in toward the corpse, creating an uncomfortable atmosphere for the audience. I think this shows how far we've come in understanding how every shot holds such significance, and the importance of a detailed storyboard, which we didn't have for our preliminary task.
We didn't use a soundtrack in our preliminary task, just diegetic dialogue, and looking back, I regret this decision. In our Thriller, because we layered soundtrack we managed to build a greater sense of tension, and juxtapositions, everything interlocking with one another. We edited sound out of clips when people or a unwanted diegetic noise can be heard in the background. We didn't edit sound at all in our preliminary task, making for a few shots where the beginning of a word can be heard before quickly cutting elsewhere. This editing, as well as sound recording was messy and made for an amateur final product, hereby teaching us how effective sound editing is to making the final product appear more professional.
Finally, in our preliminary task, we thrived to use a fade to black at the end when Fiona blows out the candle, to make for a sense of drama and form a threatening atmosphere. But again, due to our lack of knowledge of how to use premier pro, we just let the film come to an abrupt stop, which in truth looks terrible. We use a fade to black, and a soundbridge at the end of our Thriller in such an exciting manner than leaves the audience hooked, which is something we wanted to achieve in our preliminary, but just simply failed at doing. After our preliminary task, our group split up. Due to a lack of communication, one person who was in our group for the preliminary task joined after we'd filmed, therefore making the situation complicated. And so, when it came to creating our Thriller opening, he and another member left. This lead me to realise that working in a smaller compact group of three is so much easier than working in a larger group of five as it shares the workload out more evenly. Our smaller group also made for an easier development of an engaging narrative, as because of similarities in personality in real life we were able to stay on the same page regarding how our plot would play out, as well as bounce ideas off one another. This was as opposed to our larger group for the preliminary task with many contrasting opinions. We could have debates over which Thriller conventions to comply to and which to defy and make our own. It was so nice to have to support amongst ourselves, after I had edited the first draft of our Thriller opening, Emily took over to bring it to the final cut, but I would sit and give my opinion constantly as to what had to change and we changed it. Deadlines we were met with ease due to this teamwork .
























